Your Ask Joey ™ Answer

What factors should be assessed to understand the risk of fraud?

When assessing the existence of fraud, try to think like a fraudster! Try to understand where the opportunity to commit fraud is, where there are any pressures or incentives, and how an employee might rationalize fraud. The three key factors of fraud to assess include opportunities, pressure & incentives, and rationalization & attitude.

1) Opportunities: Opportunity reflects the risk that members of company management will have the opportunity to take advantage of ineffective internal control procedures or override those controls in order to take advantage for their own self-interest. Management opportunities can appear in various different forms, but typically they will appear when management believes there are weaknesses within the company believes that nobody will notice if assets are taken from the company.

2) Pressure & incentives: Incentives and pressure are common reasons for management to become tempted to commit fraud. Pressures can be due to financial needs and will be used to motivate company personnel for committing fraud. Incentives are reasons for management to feel motivated to commit fraud (e.g. monetary gain).

3) Rationalization & attitude: Managements rationalization and overall attitude can become fraud risk factors when assessing a company’s internal controls. Rationalization can relate to a person frequently justifying reasons for committing fraud (e.g. “I will pay the company back when I receive my next bonus”)!

Back To All Questions

You might also be interested in...

  • CECL Excel Workbook

    If you would like to use the Excel workbook that was used to create the Universal CPA lecture on CECL for debt securities, please click the link below to download the Excel workbook: CECL Calculation workbook (Universal CPA Review)

  • Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance

    Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance In the current year, Mission Burrito budgeted 6,000 pounds of production and actually used 4,000 pounds. Material cost was budgeted for $5 per pound and the actual cost was $8 per pound. What would the debit or credit to the direct material efficiency variance account be for the current...

  • Understanding Variance Analysis

    Variance Analysis Variance analysis is a method for companies to compare its actual performance vs its budgeted amount for that cost measurement (related to the flexible budget). The differences between the standard (budgeted) amount of cost and the actual amount that the organization incurs is referred to as a variance. By analyzing variances, the company...