Does detection risk increase or decrease when confirmation procedures are performed prior to year-end?
Let’s say that the auditors decide to perform cash or accounts receivable confirmations on September 30, Year 2 rather than December 31, Year 2. This means that they are performing substantive confirmation procedures 3 months prior to year-end. By performing substantive procedures prior to the balance sheet date, this increases the risk of material misstatement since the confirmation procedures aren’t performed as of the balance sheet date (December 31, Year 2).
By doing so, the audit team is increasing the level of detection risk. This means that there is a greater chance of the audit team not identifying a material misstatement in the financial statements.
Back To All Questions
You might also be interested in...
-
CECL Excel Workbook
If you would like to use the Excel workbook that was used to create the Universal CPA lecture on CECL for debt securities, please click the link below to download the Excel workbook: CECL Calculation workbook (Universal CPA Review)
-
Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance
Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance In the current year, Mission Burrito budgeted 6,000 pounds of production and actually used 4,000 pounds. Material cost was budgeted for $5 per pound and the actual cost was $8 per pound. What would the debit or credit to the direct material efficiency variance account be for the current...
-
Understanding Variance Analysis
Variance Analysis Variance analysis is a method for companies to compare its actual performance vs its budgeted amount for that cost measurement (related to the flexible budget). The differences between the standard (budgeted) amount of cost and the actual amount that the organization incurs is referred to as a variance. By analyzing variances, the company...
CECL Excel Workbook
If you would like to use the Excel workbook that was used to create the Universal CPA lecture on CECL for debt securities, please click the link below to download the Excel workbook: CECL Calculation workbook (Universal CPA Review)
Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance
Journal Entry for Direct Materials Variance In the current year, Mission Burrito budgeted 6,000 pounds of production and actually used 4,000 pounds. Material cost was budgeted for $5 per pound and the actual cost was $8 per pound. What would the debit or credit to the direct material efficiency variance account be for the current...
Understanding Variance Analysis
Variance Analysis Variance analysis is a method for companies to compare its actual performance vs its budgeted amount for that cost measurement (related to the flexible budget). The differences between the standard (budgeted) amount of cost and the actual amount that the organization incurs is referred to as a variance. By analyzing variances, the company...
